4.7 Article

EVOLUTION OF THE FRACTION OF CLUMPY GALAXIES AT 0.2 < z < 1.0 IN THE COSMOS FIELD

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 786, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/15

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: irregular; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-GO-09822]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17253001, 19340046, 23244031, 23740152]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23740152, 23244031] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the Hubble Space Telescope/Advanced Camera for Surveys data in the COSMOS field, we systematically searched clumpy galaxies at 0.2 < z < 1.0 and investigated the fraction of clumpy galaxies and its evolution as a function of stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and specific SFR (SSFR). The fraction of clumpy galaxies in star-forming galaxies with M-star > 10(9.5) M circle dot decreases with time from similar to 0.35 at 0.8 < z < 1.0 to similar to 0.05 at 0.2 < z < 0.4, irrespective of the stellar mass, although the fraction tends to be slightly lower for massive galaxies with M-star > 10(10.5) M circle dot at each redshift. On the other hand, the fraction of clumpy galaxies increases with increasing both SFR and SSFR in all the redshift ranges we investigated. In particular, we found that the SSFR dependences of the fractions are similar among galaxies with different stellar masses, and the fraction at a given SSFR does not depend on the stellar mass in each redshift bin. The evolution of the fraction of clumpy galaxies from z similar to 0.9 to z similar to 0.3 seems to be explained by such SSFR dependence of the fraction and the evolution of SSFRs of star-forming galaxies. The fraction at a given SSFR also appears to decrease with time, but this can be due to the effect of the morphological k correction. We suggest that these results are understood by the gravitational fragmentation model for the formation of giant clumps in disk galaxies, where the gas mass fraction is a crucial parameter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available