4.7 Article

THE ACS LCID PROJECT. X. THE STAR FORMATION HISTORY OF IC 1613: REVISITING THE OVER-COOLING PROBLEM

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 786, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/44

Keywords

early universe; galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: photometry; galaxies: stellar content; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. NASA - Space Telescope Science Institute [GO-10515]
  2. AURA, Inc. [NAS5-26555]
  3. NASA through Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF-51331.01]
  4. Space Telescope Science Institute
  5. IAC [P3/94]
  6. Science and Technology Ministry of the Kingdom of Spain [AYA2007-3E3507]
  7. Economy and Competitiveness Ministry of the Kingdom of Spain [AYA2010-16717]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analysis of the star formation history (SFH) of a field near the half-light radius in the Local Group dwarf irregular galaxy IC 1613 based on deep Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys imaging. Our observations reach the oldest main sequence turn-off, allowing a time resolution at the oldest ages of similar to 1Gyr. Our analysis shows that the SFH of the observed field in IC 1613 is consistent with being constant over the entire lifetime of the galaxy. These observations rule out an early dominant episode of star formation in IC 1613. We compare the SFH of IC 1613 with expectations from cosmological models. Since most of the mass is in place at early times for low-mass halos, a naive expectation is that most of the star formation should have taken place at early times. Models in which star formation follows mass accretion result in too many stars formed early and gas mass fractions that are too low today (the over-cooling problem). The depth of the present photometry of IC 1613 shows that, at a resolution of similar to 1Gyr, the star formation rate is consistent with being constant, at even the earliest times, which is difficult to achieve in models where star formation follows mass assembly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available