4.7 Article

GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE RADIATION SPECTRA FROM RELATIVISTIC ELECTRONS MOVING IN LANGMUIR TURBULENCE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 787, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/28

Keywords

plasmas; radiation mechanisms: general; turbulence; waves

Funding

  1. JSPS Research Fellowships [24593]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a numerical method, we examine the radiation spectra from relativistic electrons moving in Langmuir turbulence, which are expected to exist in high energy astrophysical objects. The spectral shape is characterized by the spatial scale lambda, field strength sigma, and frequency of the Langmuir waves, and in terms of frequency they are represented by omega(0) = 2 pi c/lambda, omega(st) = e sigma/mc, and omega(p), respectively. We normalize omega(st) and omega(p) by omega(0) as a omega(st)/omega(0) and b = omega(p)/omega(0), and examine the spectral shape in the a-b plane. An earlier study based on the diffusive radiation in Langmuir turbulence (DRL) theory by Fleishman & Toptygin showed that the typical frequency is gamma(2)omega(p) and that the low frequency spectrum behaves as F-omega alpha omega(1) for b > 1 irrespective of a. Here, we adopt the first principle numerical approach to obtain the radiation spectra in more detail. We generate Langmuir turbulence by superposing Fourier modes, injecting monoenergetic electrons, solving the equation of motion, and calculating the radiation spectra using a Lienard-Wiechert potential. We find different features from the DRL theory for a > b > 1. The peak frequency turns out to be gamma(2)omega(st), which is higher than the gamma(2)omega(p) predicted by the DRL theory, and the spectral index of the low frequency region is not 1 but 1/3. This is because the typical deflection angle of electrons is larger than the angle of the beaming cone similar to 1/gamma. We call the radiation for this case wiggler radiation in Langmuir turbulence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available