4.7 Article

A TWO-YEAR TIME DELAY FOR THE LENSED QUASAR SDSS J1029+2623

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 764, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/186

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; gravitational lensing: strong; quasars: individual (SDSS J102913.94+262317.9)

Funding

  1. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
  2. NSF [AST-1009756]
  3. FIRST program Subaru Measurements of Images and Redshifts (SuMIRe)
  4. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative)
  5. MEXT, Japan
  6. JSPS [23740161]
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  8. National Science Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  10. University of Arizona
  11. Brazilian Participation Group
  12. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  13. University of Cambridge
  14. Carnegie Mellon University
  15. University of Florida
  16. French Participation Group
  17. German Participation Group
  18. Harvard University
  19. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  20. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  21. Johns Hopkins University
  22. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  23. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  24. New Mexico State University
  25. New York University
  26. Ohio State University
  27. Pennsylvania State University
  28. University of Portsmouth
  29. Princeton University
  30. Spanish Participation Group
  31. University of Tokyo
  32. University of Utah
  33. Vanderbilt University
  34. University of Virginia
  35. University of Washington
  36. Yale University
  37. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  38. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1009756] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  39. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23740161] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present 279 epochs of optical monitoring data spanning 5.4 years from 2007 January to 2012 June for the largest image separation (22.'' 6) gravitationally lensed quasar, SDSS J1029+2623. We find that image A leads the images B and C by Delta t(AB) = (744 +/- 10) days (90% confidence); the uncertainty includes both statistical uncertainties and systematic differences due to the choice of models. With only a similar to 1% fractional error, the interpretation of the delay is limited primarily by cosmic variance due to fluctuations in the mean line-of-sight density. We cannot separate the fainter image C from image B, but since image C trails image B by only 2-3 days in all models, the estimate of the time delay between images A and B is little affected by combining the fluxes of images B and C. There is weak evidence for a low level of microlensing, perhaps created by the small galaxy responsible for the flux ratio anomaly in this system. Interpreting the delay depends on better constraining the shape of the gravitational potential using the lensed host galaxy, other lensed arcs, and the structure of the X-ray emission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available