4.7 Article

THE OBSERVED RELATION BETWEEN STELLAR MASS, DUST EXTINCTION, AND STAR FORMATION RATE IN LOCAL GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 763, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/92

Keywords

dust, extinction; galaxies: abundances; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation; ISM: abundances

Funding

  1. NSF EARLY CAREER AWARD [AST07-48559]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgesellshaft (DFG)
  3. Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0748559] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigate the relation between stellar mass, dust extinction, and star formation rate (SFR) using similar to 150,000 star-forming galaxies from SDSS DR7. We show that the relation between dust extinction and SFR changes with stellar mass. For galaxies at the same stellar mass, dust extinction is anti-correlated with the SFR at stellar masses <10(10) M-circle dot. There is a sharp transition in the relation at a stellar mass of 10(10) M-circle dot. At larger stellar masses, dust extinction is positively correlated with the SFR for galaxies at the same stellar mass. The observed relation between stellar mass, dust extinction, and SFR presented in this study helps to confirm similar trends observed in the relation between stellar mass, metallicity, and SFR. The relation reported in this study provides important new constraints on the physical processes governing the chemical evolution of galaxies. The correlation between SFR and dust extinction for galaxies with stellar masses >10(10) M-circle dot is shown to extend to the population of quiescent galaxies suggesting that the physical processes responsible for the observed relation between stellar mass, dust extinction, and SFR may be related to the processes leading to the shutdown of star formation in galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available