4.7 Article

THE ULTRALUMINOUS X-RAY SOURCES NGC 1313 X-1 AND X-2: A BROADBAND STUDY WITH NuSTAR AND XMM-Newton

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 778, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/163

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; stars: black holes; X-rays: individual (NGC 1313 X-1, NGC 1313 X-2); X-rays: stars

Funding

  1. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
  2. NASA [NNG08FD60C]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. ESA Member States
  5. NASA
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000985/1, ST/J001538/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. UK Space Agency [ST/L005611/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [ST/K000985/1, ST/J001538/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of NuSTAR and XMM-Newton observations of the two ultraluminous X-ray sources: NGC 1313 X-1 and X-2. The combined spectral bandpass of the two satellites enables us to produce the first spectrum of X-1 between 0.3 and 30 keV, while X-2 is not significantly detected by NuSTAR above 10 keV. The NuSTAR data demonstrate that X-1 has a clear cutoff above 10 keV, whose presence was only marginally detectable with previous X-ray observations. This cutoff rules out the interpretation of X-1 as a black hole in a standard low/hard state, and it is deeper than predicted for the downturn of a broadened iron line in a reflection-dominated regime. The cutoff differs from the prediction of a single-temperature Comptonization model. Further, a cold disk-like blackbody component at similar to 0.3 keV is required by the data, confirming previous measurements by XMM-Newton only. We observe a spectral transition in X- 2, from a state with high luminosity and strong variability to a lower-luminosity state with no detectable variability, and we link this behavior to a transition from a super-Eddington to a sub-Eddington regime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available