4.7 Article

ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATES IN THE ERA OF TIME DOMAIN ASTRONOMY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 779, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/187

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; galaxies: active; galaxies: Seyfert; methods: statistical; quasars: general

Funding

  1. Southern California Center for Galaxy Evolution
  2. University of California Office of Research
  3. NASA [NNX13AP16G, NNX11AO45G]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  5. Korea government [2012-006087]
  6. NASA [NNX11AO45G, 140126, NNX13AP16G, 467469] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the dependence of the normalization of the high-frequency part of the X-ray and optical power spectral densities (PSDs) on black hole mass for a sample of 39 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) with black hole masses estimated from reverberation mapping or dynamical modeling. We obtained new Swift observations of PG 1426+015, which has the largest estimated black hole mass of the AGNs in our sample. We develop a novel statistical method to estimate the PSD from a light curve of photon counts with arbitrary sampling, eliminating the need to bin a light curve to achieve Gaussian statistics, and we use this technique to estimate the X-ray variability parameters for the faint AGNs in our sample. We find that the normalization of the high-frequency X-ray PSD is inversely proportional to black hole mass. We discuss how to use this scaling relationship to obtain black hole mass estimates from the short timescale X-ray variability amplitude with precision similar to 0.38 dex. The amplitude of optical variability on timescales of days is also anticorrelated with black hole mass, but with larger scatter. Instead, the optical variability amplitude exhibits the strongest anticorrelation with luminosity. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our results for estimating black hole mass from the amplitude of AGN variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available