4.7 Article

PRIMUS: CONSTRAINTS ON STAR FORMATION QUENCHING AND GALAXY MERGING, AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE STELLAR MASS FUNCTION FROM z=0-1

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 767, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/50

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; large-scale structure of universe; surveys

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0607701, 0908246, 0908442, 0908354]
  2. NASA [08-ADP08-0019, 08-ADP08-0072]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. NSF CAREER award [AST-1055081]
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. U.S. Department of Energy
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  8. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  9. Max Planck Society
  10. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  11. American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute Potsdam, University of Basel
  12. University of Cambridge
  13. Case Western Reserve University
  14. University of Chicago
  15. Drexel University
  16. Fermilab
  17. Institute for Advanced Study
  18. Japan Participation Group
  19. Johns Hopkins University
  20. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  21. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  22. Korean Scientist Group
  23. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  24. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  25. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  26. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  27. New Mexico State University
  28. Ohio State University
  29. University of Pittsburgh
  30. University of Portsmouth
  31. Princeton University
  32. United States Naval Observatory
  33. University of Washington
  34. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  35. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0908442] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the evolution of the stellar mass function (SMF) from z = 0-1 using multi-wavelength imaging and spectroscopic redshifts from the PRismMUlti-object Survey (PRIMUS) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). From PRIMUS we construct an i < 23 flux-limited sample of similar to 40,000 galaxies at z = 0.2-1.0 over five fields totaling approximate to 5.5 deg(2), and from the SDSS we select similar to 170,000 galaxies at z = 0.01-0.2 that we analyze consistently with respect to PRIMUS to minimize systematic errors in our evolutionary measurements. We find that the SMF of all galaxies evolves relatively little since z = 1, although we do find evidence for mass assembly downsizing; we measure a approximate to 30% increase in the number density of similar to 10(10) M-circle dot galaxies since z approximate to 0.6, and a less than or similar to 10% change in the number density of all greater than or similar to 10(11) M-circle dot galaxies since z approximate to 1. Dividing the sample into star-forming and quiescent using an evolving cut in specific star formation rate, we find that the number density of similar to 10(10) M-circle dot star-forming galaxies stays relatively constant since z approximate to 0.6, whereas the space density of greater than or similar to 10(11) M-circle dot star-forming galaxies decreases by similar to 50% between z approximate to 1 and z approximate to 0. Meanwhile, the number density of similar to 10(10) M-circle dot quiescent galaxies increases steeply toward low redshift, by a factor of similar to 2-3 since z approximate to 0.6, while the number of massive quiescent galaxies remains approximately constant since z approximate to 1. These results suggest that the rate at which star-forming galaxies are quenched increases with decreasing stellar mass, but that the bulk of the stellar mass buildup within the quiescent population occurs around similar to 10(10.8) M-circle dot. In addition, we conclude that mergers do not appear to be a dominant channel for the stellar mass buildup of galaxies at z < 1, even among massive (greater than or similar to 10(11) M-circle dot) quiescent galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available