4.6 Article

Toward a predictive understanding of primary productivity in a temperate, partially stratified estuary

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 437-463

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/ecss.2001.0917

Keywords

primary productivity; time-series; prediction; models; Chesapeake Bay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the development of a predictive understanding of phytoplankton primary productivity (PP) in estuaries, drawing on an extensive set of observations in Chesapeake Bay and contemporary modeling approaches coupled to empirical data. PP was measured at 575 stations on 68 cruises, 1982-2000. Descriptions presented here are based on PP data from 455 stations occupied 1982-1998, and from 120 stations occupied 1999-2000 that were used for model validation. The nearly two-decade sampling period encompassed a broad range of freshwater flow and nutrient loading to the Bay. Mean net C-14-pp for 1982-1998 was 1055 Mg C m(-2) d(-1) (+/- SE=46.0) in the main stem Bay for all seasons and regions. Phytoplankton dynamics included a spring maximum of biomass, expressed as euphotic-layer chlorophyll (chl a), and a summer maximum of net C-14-PP displaced by approximately 4 months from the biomass maximum. The annual maximum of euphotic-layer chl a exceeded 100 Mg m(-2) in mesohaline and polyhaline regions of the Bay during April and May, whereas highest net C-14-PP of 1700-2500 mg C m(-2) d(-1) occurred in the mesohaline Bay in July and August. Euphotic-layer chl a and net C-14-PP were much lower in the light-limited oligohaline Bay and no time lag was observed. Mean gross C-14-pp was 1564 mg C m(-2) d(-1) (+/-SE= 85.0) for 1995-1998. Concurrent measurements using C-14 and O-2 methods generated estimates of the photosynthetic quotient (PQ) to confirm our interpretation of net and gross PP from C-14 uptake in full- and partial-day incubations, respectively, and allowed us to reconcile apparent differences in C-14- and O-2-determined PP in recent studies. PQ values (=O-2 produced/CO2 fixed) were estimated as 1.48 from regression of stoichiometrically converted net O-2-PP on net C-14-PP, and as 1.38 from the regression of gross O-2-PP on gross C-14-pp. PQ values in this range typically correspond to phytoplankton that are using oxidized nitrogen (NO3--N) as the main N source, consistent with the view that N-limitation occurs on an annual scale in the Bay. We used empirical data for net and gross C-14-PP to estimate annual integrated production (AIP) of 282 to 538 g C m(-2) yr(-1) (net) and 347 to 662 g C m(-2) yr(-1) (gross). Simple, linear regression of net AIP on annual, mean euphotic-layer chl a was significant and explained similar to62 % of the variance. Inter-annual variability of net AIP was related to the volume of freshwater flow and to total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loading during February and March. We tested the performance of published models to estimate PP in Chesapeake Bay. The Vertically Generalized Productivity Model (VGPM) overestimated net and gross PP, and adjusted forms of VGPM termed VGPM-A for net and gross PP gave significantly improved performance for Chesapeake Bay. We explored an alternative approach to VGPM that allowed us to obtain non-unity exponents for independent variables, using step-wise and multiple regressions in log-space first to identify independent variables that predicted net and gross PP, and subsequently to determine coefficients of the terms. This approach resulted in the Chesapeake Bay Productivity Model (CBPM-1) that estimated net and gross PP with root mean square error (RMSE) of 28.3% and 34.9%, respectively. We then developed models of the P-opt(B), a variable that expresses optimal photosynthesis in the water column normalized to chl a, using physiological input p(opt)(B) several independent variables and measured values of P-opt(t). Substitution of the models of p(opt)(B), in CBPM-1 resulted in CBPM-2 that required no explicit input Pt and estimated net and gross PP with RMSE of 120% and 49-8%, respectively. Lastly, we validated CBPM-1 and CBPM-2 using observations from 1999-2000 not included in development of the models. CBPM-1 estimated net and gross PP with RMSE of 17.8% and 35.8%, respectively, and CBPM-2 estimated net and gross PP with RMSE of 80.3% and 47.6%, respectively. We believe the use of contemporary PP models that require simple inputs amenable to remote sensing, such as the adjusted VGPM, CBPM-1, and CBPM-2, should permit us to resolve spatial and temporal differences of net and gross PP in estuaries and give improved estimates of AIP, an essential measure of ecosystem health and productivity. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available