4.7 Article

Correlation between SMN2 copy number and clinical phenotype of spinal muscular atrophy:: three SMN2 copies fail to rescue some patients from the disease severity

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 249, Issue 9, Pages 1211-1219

Publisher

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-002-0811-4

Keywords

spinal muscular atrophy; SMN1; SMN2; copy number; NAIP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a common autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder that is characterized by degeneration of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord, which leads to the axial and limb weakness associated with muscle atrophy. SMA is classified into three groups based on the clinical severity: type I (severe), type II (intermediate) and type III (mild). All three clinical subtypes of SMA are caused by mutations of the SMN1 gene. More than 95% of SMA patients show homozygous deletion of SMN1. It is thought that SMN2, which is a highly homologous gene of SMN1, compensates for the SMN1 deletion to some degree. To clarify the relationship between SMN2 and the disease severity of SMA, we performed fluorescence-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay of the copy number of SMN2 in 27 patients (11 type I and 16 type II-III) homozygous for SMN1 deletion. The SMN2 copy number in type II-III patients was 3.1 +/- 0.3 (mean +/- SD), which is significantly higher than that observed in type I patients, 2.2 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.01). However, three of the 11 type I patients carried 3 SMN2 copies. A type I patient with 3 SMN2 copies was studied further. RT-PCR analysis of the patient showed a trace of full-length SMN2 mRNA species, but a large amount of the truncated SMN2 mRNA species lacking exon 7. In conclusion, SMN2 alleles are not functionally equivalent among SMA patients, although in general the SMN2 copy number is correlated with the severity of SMA. Genetic background influencing splicing mechanisms of the SMN2 gene may be more critical in some SMA patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available