4.7 Article

IMPACT OF H2-BASED STAR FORMATION MODEL ON THE z ≥ 6 LUMINOSITY FUNCTION AND THE IONIZING PHOTON BUDGET FOR REIONIZATION

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 766, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/94

Keywords

cosmology: theory; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0807491]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant/Cooperative Agreement [NNX08AE57A]
  3. Nevada NASA EPSCoR program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of a numerical study examining the effect of an H-2-based star formation (SF) model on the rest-frame UV luminosity function and star formation rate function (SFRF) of z >= 6 galaxies, and the implications for reionization. Using cosmological hydrodynamical simulations outfitted with an H-2-SF model, we find good agreement with our previous results (non-H-2 SF model) and observations at M-uv <= -18. However, at M-uv > -18, we find that the LF deviates from both our previous work and current observational extrapolations, producing significantly fewer low-luminosity galaxies and exhibiting additional turnover at the faint end. We constrain the redshift evolution of this turnover point using a modified Schechter function that includes additional terms to quantify the turnover magnitude (M-uv(t)) and subsequent slope (beta). We find that M-uv(t) evolves from M-uv(t) = -17.33 (at z = 8) to -15.38 (z = 6), while a becomes shallower by Delta beta = 0.22 during the same epoch. This occurs in an Muv range that will be observable by James Webb Space Telescope. By integrating the SFRF, we determine that even though the H-2-SF model significantly reduces the number density of low-luminosity galaxies at M-uv > -18, it does not suppress the total SFR density enough to affect the capability of SF to maintain reionization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available