4.7 Article

THE PROGRESSION OF STAR FORMATION IN THE ROSETTE MOLECULAR CLOUD

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 769, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/140

Keywords

ISM: clouds; ISM: individual objects (Rosette Molecular Cloud); methods: data analysis; stars: formation

Funding

  1. NASA
  2. JPL/Caltech
  3. NASA LTSA [NNG05GD66G]
  4. NSF [AST-1109679]
  5. Chandra ACIS Team through the SAO [SV4-74018]
  6. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center GSRP [NNX10AM07H]
  7. Florida Space Grant Consortium
  8. CONACyT, Mexico [152160]
  9. project UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT [IA101812]
  10. NASA [GO1-12030X]
  11. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109679] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using Spitzer Space Telescope and Chandra X-Ray Observatory data, we identify young stellar objects (YSOs) in the Rosette Molecular Cloud (RMC). By being able to select cluster members and classify them into YSO types, we are able to track the progression of star formation locally within the cluster environments and globally within the cloud. We employ the nearest neighbor method analysis to explore the density structure of the clusters and YSO ratio mapping to study age progressions in the cloud. We find a relationship between the YSO ratios and extinction that suggests star formation occurs preferentially in the densest parts of the cloud and that the column density of gas rapidly decreases as the region evolves. This suggests rapid removal of gas may account for the low star formation efficiencies observed in molecular clouds. We find that the overall age spread across the RMC is small. Our analysis suggests that star formation started throughout the complex around the same time. Age gradients in the cloud appear to be localized and any effect the HII region has on the star formation history is secondary to that of the primordial collapse of the cloud.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available