4.7 Article

THE STELLAR METALLICITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF THE GALACTIC HALO FROM SDSS PHOTOMETRY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 763, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/65

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: evolution; Galaxy: formation; Galaxy: halo; Galaxy: stellar content

Funding

  1. Ewha Womans University
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0027910]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY 02-16783, PHY 08-22648]
  4. NSF [AST-0707948, AST-1008784, AST-0551161, AST-1009670]
  5. NASA Astrophysics Theory Program [NNX11AE04G]
  6. NASA [HST-HF-51285.01, NAS5-26555]
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  8. National Science Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy
  10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  11. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  12. Max Planck Society
  13. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  14. American Museum of Natural History
  15. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  16. University of Basel
  17. University of Cambridge
  18. Case Western Reserve University
  19. University of Chicago
  20. Drexel University
  21. Fermilab
  22. Institute for Advanced Study
  23. Japan Participation Group
  24. Johns Hopkins University
  25. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  26. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  27. Korean Scientist Group
  28. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  29. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  30. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  31. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  32. New Mexico State University
  33. Ohio State University
  34. University of Pittsburgh
  35. University of Portsmouth
  36. Princeton University
  37. United States Naval Observatory
  38. University of Washington
  39. NASA [148406, NNX11AE04G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  40. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0027910] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  41. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  42. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1008784] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore the stellar metallicity distribution function of the Galactic halo based on SDSS ugriz photometry. A set of stellar isochrones is calibrated using observations of several star clusters and validated by comparisons with medium-resolution spectroscopic values over a wide range of metal abundance. We estimate distances and metallicities for individual main-sequence stars in the multiply scanned SDSS Stripe 82, at heliocentric distances in the range 5-8 kpc and |b| > 35 degrees, and find that the in situ photometric metallicity distribution has a shape that matches that of the kinematically selected local halo stars from Ryan & Norris. We also examine independent kinematic information from proper-motion measurements for high Galactic latitude stars in our sample. We find that stars with retrograde rotation in the rest frame of the Galaxy are generally more metal poor than those exhibiting prograde rotation, which is consistent with earlier arguments by Carollo et al. that the halo system comprises at least two spatially overlapping components with differing metallicity, kinematics, and spatial distributions. The observed photometric metallicity distribution and that of Ryan & Norris can be described by a simple chemical evolution model by Hartwick (or by a single Gaussian distribution); however, the suggestive metallicity-kinematic correlation contradicts the basic assumption in this model that the Milky Way halo consists primarily of a single stellar population. When the observed metallicity distribution is deconvolved using two Gaussian components with peaks at [Fe/H] approximate to -1.7 and -2.3, the metal-poor component accounts for approximate to 20%-35% of the entire halo population in this distance range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available