4.7 Article

PROBING THE LOW-REDSHIFT STAR FORMATION RATE AS A FUNCTION OF METALLICITY THROUGH THE LOCAL ENVIRONMENTS OF TYPE II SUPERNOVAE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 773, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/12

Keywords

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: dwarf; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. David G. Price Fellowship in Astronomical Instrumentation
  2. Tuttle Endowment
  3. NASA [HF-51261.01-A, NAS 5-26555]
  4. STScI
  5. NSF [AST-0705170]
  6. Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics at The Ohio State University
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  8. University of Arizona
  9. Brazilian Participation Group
  10. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  11. University of Cambridge
  12. University of Florida
  13. French Participation Group
  14. German Participation Group
  15. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  16. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  17. Johns Hopkins University
  18. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  19. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  20. New Mexico State University
  21. New York University
  22. Ohio State University
  23. Pennsylvania State University
  24. University of Portsmouth
  25. Princeton University
  26. Spanish Participation Group
  27. University of Tokyo
  28. University of Utah
  29. Vanderbilt University
  30. University of Virginia
  31. University of Washington
  32. Yale University
  33. National Science Foundation
  34. U.S. Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type II supernovae (SNe) can be used as a star formation tracer to probe the metallicity distribution of global low-redshift star formation. We present oxygen and iron abundance distributions of Type II SN progenitor regions that avoid many previous sources of bias. Because iron abundance, rather than oxygen abundance, is of key importance for the late stage evolution of the massive stars that are the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae, and because iron enrichment lags oxygen enrichment, we find a general conversion from oxygen abundance to iron abundance. The distributions we present here are the best yet observational standard of comparison for evaluating how different classes of supernovae depend on progenitor metallicity. We spectroscopically measure the gas-phase oxygen abundance near a representative subsample of the hosts of Type II SNe from the first-year Palomar Transient Factory (PTF) SN search, using a combination of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectra near the SN location (9 hosts) and new longslit spectroscopy (25 hosts). The median metallicity of these 34 hosts at or near the SN location is 12+log(O/H) = 8.65, with a median error of 0.09. The median host galaxy stellar mass from fits to SDSS photometry is 10(9.9) M-circle dot. They do not show a systematic offset in metallicity or mass from a redshift-matched sample of the MPA/JHU value-added catalog. In contrast to previous SN host metallicity studies, this sample is drawn from a single survey. It is also drawn from an areal rather than a targeted survey, so SNe in the lowest-mass galaxies are not systematically excluded. Indeed, the PTF SN search has a slight bias toward following up transients in low mass galaxies. The progenitor region metallicity distribution we find is statistically indistinguishable from the metallicity distribution of Type II SN hosts found by targeted surveys and by samples from multiple surveys with different selection functions. Using the relationship between iron and oxygen abundances found for Milky Way disk, bulge, and halo stars, we translate our distribution of Type II SN environments as a function of oxygen abundance into an estimate of the iron abundance, since iron varies more steeply than oxygen. We find that though this sample spans only 0.65 dex in oxygen abundance, the gap between the iron and oxygen abundance is 50% wider at the low-metallicity end of our sample than at the high-metallicity end.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available