4.7 Article

RHAPSODY. I. STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES AND FORMATION HISTORY FROM A STATISTICAL SAMPLE OF RE-SIMULATED CLUSTER-SIZE HALOS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 763, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/70

Keywords

cosmology: theory; dark matter; galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: halos; methods: numerical

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515, DE-FG02-95ER40899]
  2. Stanford University
  3. [SLAC-LDRD-0030-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first results from the Rhapsody cluster re-simulation project: a sample of 96 zoom-in simulations of dark matter halos of 10(14.8 +/- 0.05) h(-1) M-circle dot, selected from a 1 h(-3) Gpc(3) volume. This simulation suite is the first to resolve this many halos with similar to 5 x 10(6) particles per halo in the cluster mass regime, allowing us to statistically characterize the distribution of and correlation between halo properties at fixed mass. We focus on the properties of the main halos and how they are affected by formation history, which we track back to z = 12, over five decades in mass. We give particular attention to the impact of the formation history on the density profiles of the halos. We find that the deviations from the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) model and the Einasto model depend on formation time. Late-forming halos tend to have considerable deviations from both models, partly due to the presence of massive subhalos, while early-forming halos deviate less but still significantly from the NFW model and are better described by the Einasto model. We find that the halo shapes depend only moderately on formation time. Departure from spherical symmetry impacts the density profiles through the anisotropic distribution of massive subhalos. Further evidence of the impact of subhalos is provided by analyzing the phase-space structure. A detailed analysis of the properties of the subhalo population in Rhapsody is presented in a companion paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available