4.8 Article

The type of sodium-coupled solute modulates small bowel mucosal injury, transport function, and ATP after Ischemia/Reperfusion injury in rats

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 810-816

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.35389

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [P50 GM38529] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Gastrointestinal function may be impaired after severe injury, hampering tolerance to enteral nutrition. The purpose of this study was to determine how different sodium-coupled solutes modulate gut function after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in a rodent model. Methods: At laparotomy, rats had jejunal sacs filled with (glucose + alanine), glucose, glutamine, alanine, or mannitol (osmotic control), followed by superior mesenteric artery clamping for 60 minutes and 30 minutes of reperfusion. After reperfusion, sacs were harvested for morphologic examination, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assay, or mounted in an Ussing chamber. Results: Small intestinal epithelial absorptive capacity, as assessed by changes in short-circuit current in response to glucose, after gut I/R, was decreased by alanine or (glucose + alanine) but not glucose or glutamine alone and correlated with changes in tissue ATP. Gut I/R caused a significant morphologic injury that was worsened by alanine or (glucose + alanine) but lessened by glucose or glutamine alone. Conclusions. During gut I/R, alanine can enhance gut injury, deplete energy (ATP), and impair gut absorption, whereas glucose or glutamine is protective against injury and can maintain absorptive capacity and ATP. These results suggest that solutes (such as alanine), which further stress an already metabolically stressed bowel, should be cautiously administered to critically ill patients whereas those solutes that contribute to energy production (such as glucose and glutamine) may be safely continued.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available