4.7 Article

MODELING THE ATOMIC-TO-MOLECULAR TRANSITION AND CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF TURBULENT STAR-FORMING CLOUDS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 770, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/49

Keywords

astrochemistry; hydrodynamics; ISM: molecules; molecular processes; stars: formation; turbulence

Funding

  1. NSF grant [AST-0901055]
  2. NASA grant [HF-51311.01]
  3. STFC grant [ST/J001511/1]
  4. JAE-DOC research contract
  5. Spanish MINECO [AYA2009-07304, CSD200900038]
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J005673/1, ST/H001794/1, ST/H008586/1, ST/F501761/1, ST/J001511/1, ST/K00333X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [ST/J005673/1, ST/F501761/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/J001511/1, ST/H008586/1, ST/H001794/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use 3D-PDR, a three-dimensional astrochemistry code for modeling photodissociation regions (PDRs), to post-process hydrodynamic simulations of turbulent, star-forming clouds. We focus on the transition from atomic to molecular gas, with specific attention to the formation and distribution of H, C+, C, H-2, and CO. First, we demonstrate that the details of the cloud chemistry and our conclusions are insensitive to the simulation spatial resolution, to the resolution at the cloud edge, and to the ray angular resolution. We then investigate the effect of geometry and simulation parameters on chemical abundances and find weak dependence on cloud morphology as dictated by gravity and turbulent Mach number. For a uniform external radiation field, we find similar distributions to those derived using a one-dimensional PDR code. However, we demonstrate that a three-dimensional treatment is necessary for a spatially varying external field, and we caution against using one-dimensional treatments for non-symmetric problems. We compare our results with the work of Glover et al., who self-consistently followed the time evolution of molecule formation in hydrodynamic simulations using a reduced chemical network. In general, we find good agreement with this in situ approach for C and CO abundances. However, the temperature and H-2 abundances are discrepant in the boundary regions (A(v) <= 5), which is due to the different number of rays used by the two approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available