Journal
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 2394-2401Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2394
Keywords
digynic triploidy; digyny; diploid oocytes; human triploidy; ploidy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUND: Giant binuclear oocytes occur with considerable frequency in human ovaries, but their ultimate fate remains unknown. We report the morphology, cytogenetics and developmental potential of human giant oocytes from patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 44 giant oocytes was collected from patients aged 22-44 years old, with an overall frequency of 0.3% (44/14 272 oocytes). Giant oocytes were similar to30% larger in diameter than normal oocytes (mean 200.4 versus 154.7 mum, P = 0.0001). Two different morphological patterns were observed among giant unfertilized and fertilized oocytes. All unfertilized oocytes appeared to be diploid and contained either one or two metaphase plates (46 or 2x23 chromosomes), and one or two polar bodies respectively. Consequently, fertilized giant oocytes exhibited either two or three pronuclei, or two or four polar bodies. Both types of giant zygotes were capable of normal cleavage and development to blastocyst stage. Four giant embryos were analysed by interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization using probes for chromosomes 9, 22, X and Y, and all appeared chromosomally abnormal with numerical alterations indicative of ploidy change. CONCLUSIONS: Giant oocytes might be a possible source of human digynic triploidy. To avoid undesired miscarriages, giant embryos originated from either two- or three-pronuclear giant zygotes should be excluded from uterine transfers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available