4.7 Article

Intrahepatic bile ducts transport water in response to absorbed glucose

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 283, Issue 3, Pages C785-C791

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00118.2002

Keywords

liver; cholangiocytes; absorption; secretion; aquaporins; phlorizin; microperfusion; intrahepatic bile duct units

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-24031] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The physiological relevance of the absorption of glucose from bile by cholangiocytes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that absorbed glucose drives aquaporin (AQP)-mediated water transport by biliary epithelia and is thus involved in ductal bile formation. Glucose absorption and water transport by biliary epithelia were studied in vitro by microperfusing intrahepatic bile duct units (IBDUs) isolated from rat liver. In a separate set of in vivo experiments, bile flow and absorption of biliary glucose were measured after intraportal infusion of D-glucose or phlorizin. IBDUs absorbed D-glucose in a dose- and phlorizin-dependent manner with an absorption maximum of 92.8 +/- 6.2 pmol.min(-1).mm(-1). Absorption of D-glucose by microperfused IBDUs resulted in an increase of water absorption (J(v) = 3-10 nl.min(-1).mm(-1), P-f = 40 x 10(-3) cm/sec). Glucose-driven water absorption by IBDUs was inhibited by HgCl2, suggesting that water passively follows absorbed D-glucose mainly transcellularly via mercury-sensitive AQPs. In vivo studies showed that as the amount of absorbed biliary glucose increased after intraportal infusion of D-glucose, bile flow decreased. In contrast, as the absorption of biliary glucose decreased after phlorizin, bile flow increased. Results support the hypothesis that the physiological significance of the absorption of biliary glucose by cholangiocytes is likely related to regulation of ductal bile formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available