4.6 Review

Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology

Journal

INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 334-359

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81

Keywords

trust; trusting beliefs; trusting intentions; institution-based trust; disposition to trust; e-commerce; measure; site quality; disposition; nomological network; web vendor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence suggests that consumers often hesitate to transact with Web-based vendors because of uncertainity about vendor behavior or the perceived risk of having personal information stolen by hackers. Trust plays a central role in helping consumers overcome perceptions of risk and insecurity. Trust makes consumers comfortable sharing personal information, making purchases, and acting on Web vendor advice-behaviors essential to widespread adoption of e-commerce. Therefore, trust is critical to both researchers and practitioners. Prior research on e-commerce trust has used diverse, incomplete, and inconsistent definitions of trust, making it difficult to compare results across studies. This paper contributes by proposing and validating measures for a multidisciplinary, multidimensional model of trust in e-commerce. The model includes four high-level constructs-disposition to trust, institution-based trust, trusting beliefs, and trusting intentions-which are further delineated into 16 measurable, literature-grounded subconstructs. The psychometric properties of the measures are demonstrated through use of a hypothetical, legal advice Web site. The results show that trust is indeed a multidimensional concept. Proposed relationships among the trust constructs are tested (for internal nomological validity), as are relationships between the trust constructs and three other e-commerce constructs (for external nomological validity)-Web experience, personal innovativeness, and Web site quality. Suggestions for future research as well as implications for practice are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available