4.5 Article

The importance of blood pressure variability in rat aortic and left ventricular hypertrophy produced by sinoaortic denervation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1865-1872

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200209000-00033

Keywords

blood pressure variability; arterial baroreflex; denervation; hypertrophy; aorta; heart

Ask authors/readers for more resources

objective The main objective was to examine the role of hemodynamics in rat aortic and left ventricular hypertrophy produced by sinoaortic denervation (SAD). Design and methods Rats were examined at different times after SAD or sham operation (Sham). Hemodynamics were recorded continuously in conscious unrestrained rats. The time course of hemodynamic changes and cardiovascular hypertrophy was observed and linear regression analysis was performed to study the role of hemodynamics in SAD-induced aortic and left ventricular hypertrophy. Long-term mortality, water and food intake, and body weight were also determined after operation. Results High mortality (40%), dramatic reduction of water and food intake, and weight loss occurred within 1 week after SAD. Chronic SAD rats exhibited a marked increase in blood pressure variability (BPV), with no change in the average level of blood pressure (BP), as compared with the Sham control rats. Increased BPV was higher at 2 weeks (about threefold) than 16 weeks (about twofold) after SAD. Aortic hypertrophy existed in all three kinds of examined rats: 2-, 10- and 16-week SAD rats. Left ventricular hypertrophy was found only in 10- and 16-week SAD rats. Both aortic hypertrophy and left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly and positively correlated with BPV, but not with BP level. Conclusion Persistent high BPV following SAD can lead to aortic and left ventricular hypertrophy. The aorta is more sensitive to increased BPV than the heart. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available