4.7 Article

THE GRAY NEEDLE: LARGE GRAINS IN THE HD 15115 DEBRIS DISK FROM LBT/PISCES/Ks AND LBTI/LMIRcam/L′ ADAPTIVE OPTICS IMAGING

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 752, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/57

Keywords

circumstellar matter; instrumentation: adaptive optics; planetary systems; stars: individual (HD 15115); techniques: high angular resolution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [NSF AST-0705296]
  2. NASA Earth and Space Science Graduate Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present diffraction-limited Ks band and L' adaptive optics images of the edge-on debris disk around the nearby F2 star HD 15115, obtained with a single 8.4 m primary mirror at the Large Binocular Telescope. At the Ks band, the disk is detected at signal-to-noise per resolution element (SNRE) similar to 3-8 from similar to 1 to 2 ''.5 (45-113 AU) on the western side and from similar to 1 ''.2 to 2 ''.1 (63-90 AU) on the east. At L' the disk is detected at SNRE similar to 2.5 from similar to 1 to 1 ''.45 (45-90 AU) on both sides, implying more symmetric disk structure at 3.8 mu m. At both wavelengths the disk has a bow-like shape and is offset from the star to the north by a few AU. A surface brightness asymmetry exists between the two sides of the disk at the Ks band, but not at L'. The surface brightness at the Ks band declines inside 1 ''(similar to 45 AU), which may be indicative of a gap in the disk near 1 ''. The Ks - L' disk color, after removal of the stellar color, is mostly gray for both sides of the disk. This suggests that scattered light is coming from large dust grains, with 3-10 mu m sized grains on the east side and 1-10 mu m dust grains on the west. This may suggest that the west side is composed of smaller dust grains than the east side, which would support the interpretation that the disk is being dynamically affected by interactions with the local interstellar medium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available