4.6 Article

Effect of intragastric barostat bag on proximal and distal gastric accommodation in response to liquid meal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00499.2001

Keywords

transpyloric flow; ultrasonography; accommodation; antral area

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The barostat is the gold standard for measurement of proximal gastric accommodation. Ultrasonography can be used to measure gastric volume. The aim was to investigate the effects of the barostat bag on gastric accommodation and transpyloric flow. Accommodation after a liquid meal (300 ml, 450 kcal) was measured twice at random in eight healthy volunteers. Proximal accommodation was measured once using barostat and once using ultrasound (US). Antrum accommodation was measured using US. Bag volume (BV), antral area (AA), proximal gastric area, and proximal gastric diameter (PGD) data were assessed before and 1, 5, 15, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min postprandially. Transpyloric flow was measured using Doppler 1-5 min postprandially. Fasted, AA size was not affected by the barostat bag (1 mmHg > minimal distension pressure; 2.7+/-0.5 vs. 2.6+/-0.3 cm(2)). Postprandially, AAs were larger with the bag present (ANOVA, P<0.04). Maximum AA was reached with the bag in 5 min, without the bag in 1 min postprandially (15.1±2.3 vs. 9.4±1.5 cm(2); P<0.03). Furthermore, AAs were related to BVs (r=0.57; P<0.01). After bag deflation, AA decreased (11.9±1.8 to 7.0±0.9 cm(2); P=0.02) and was comparable with the 60-min AA size without the bag (7.1±1.2 cm(2); P=0.76) present. Proximal gastric radius calculated from the BVs and PGDs was larger with the bag present (ANOVA, P<0.001). No effect on early gastric emptying was observed. Postprandially, the barostat bag causes dilatation of the antrum due to meal displacement without influencing early gastric emptying. This antral dilatation is likely to induce exaggerated proximal gastric relaxation observed in studies using the barostat to evaluate fundic accommodation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available