4.7 Article

Cortical activation to auditory mismatch elicited by frequency deviant and complex novel sounds:: A PET study

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 231-239

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1176

Keywords

mismatch negativity; novelty processing; P3a; positron emission tomography; auditory processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of auditory deviant events outside the focus of attention is a fundamental capacity of human information processing and has been studied in experiments on Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and the P3a component in evoked potential research. However, generators contributing to these components are still under discussion. Here we assessed cortical blood flow to auditory stimulation in three conditions. Six healthy subjects were presented with standard tones, frequency deviant tones (MMN condition), and complex novel sounds (Novelty condition), while attention was directed to a nondemanding visual task. Analysis of the MMN condition contrasted with the standard condition revealed blood flow changes in the left and right superior temporal gyrus, right superior temporal sulcus and left inferior frontal gyrus. Complex novel sounds contrasted with the standard condition activated the left superior temporal gyrus and the left inferior and middle frontal gyrus. A small subcortical activation emerged in the left parahippocampal gyrus and an extended activation was found covering the right superior temporal gyrus. Novel sounds activated the right inferior frontal gyrus when controlling for deviance probability. In contrast to previous studies our results indicate a left hemisphere contribution to a frontotemporal network of auditory deviance processing. Our results provide further evidence for a contribution of the frontal cortex to the processing of auditory deviance outside the focus of directed attention. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available