4.7 Article

THREE-MINUTE OSCILLATIONS ABOVE SUNSPOT UMBRA OBSERVED WITH THE SOLAR DYNAMICS OBSERVATORY/ATMOSPHERIC IMAGING ASSEMBLY AND NOBEYAMA RADIOHELIOGRAPH

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 746, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/119

Keywords

Sun: oscillations; Sun: radio radiation; sunspots; Sun: UV radiation; waves

Funding

  1. RFBR [10-02-00153, 11-02-91175, 11-02-10000-k]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2010T2J24]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H02395X/1, EP/D062837/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I000720/1, ST/F00205X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/D062837/1, EP/H02395X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. STFC [ST/I000720/1, ST/F00205X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-minute oscillations over a sunspot's umbra in AR 11131 were observed simultaneously in UV/EUV emission by the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)/Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) and in radio emission by the Nobeyama Radioheliograph (NoRH). We use 24 hr series of SDO and 8 hr series of NoRH observations to study spectral, spatial, and temporal variations of pulsations in the 5-9 mHz frequency range at different layers of the solar atmosphere. High spatial and temporal resolution of SDO/AIA in combination with long-duration observations allowed us to trace the variations of the cutoff frequency and spectrum of oscillations across the umbra. We found that higher frequency oscillations are more pronounced closer to the umbra's center, while the lower frequencies concentrate on the peripheral parts. We interpreted this discovery as a manifestation of variation of the magnetic field inclination across the umbra at the level of temperature minimum. Possible implications of this interpretation for the diagnostics of sunspot atmospheres are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available