4.7 Article

A TALE OF TWO POPULATIONS: THE CONTRIBUTION OF MERGER AND SECULAR PROCESSES TO THE EVOLUTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 751, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/72

Keywords

galaxies: active; galaxies: Seyfert; quasars: general; X-rays: diffuse background

Funding

  1. NSF [AST 1008067]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1008067] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the co-evolution of supermassive black holes and their host galaxies, understanding the mechanisms that trigger active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is imperative to understanding galaxy evolution and the formation of massive galaxies. It is observationally difficult to determine the trigger of a given AGN due to the difference between the AGN lifetime and triggering timescales. Here, we utilize AGN population synthesis modeling to determine the importance of different AGN triggering mechanisms. An AGN population model is computed by combining an observationally motivated AGN triggering rate and a theoretical AGN light curve. The free parameters of the AGN light curve are constrained by minimizing chi(2) test with respect to the observed AGN hard X-ray luminosity function. The observed black hole space density, AGN number counts, and X-ray background spectrum are also considered as observational constraints. It is found that major mergers are not able to account for the entire AGN population. Therefore, non-merger processes, such as secular mechanisms, must also trigger AGNs. Indeed, non-merger processes are the dominant AGN triggering mechanism at z less than or similar to 1-1.5. Furthermore, the shape and evolution of the black hole mass function of AGNs triggered by major mergers are intrinsically different from the shape and evolution of the black hole mass function of AGNs triggered by secular processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available