4.7 Article

EVIDENCE FOR A CLUMPY, ROTATING GAS DISK IN A SUBMILLIMETER GALAXY AT z=4

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 760, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/11

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. NASA through a Spitzer Space Telescope grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array observations of the CO(2-1) emission in the z = 4.05 submillimeter galaxy (SMG) GN20. These high-resolution data allow us to image the molecular gas at 1.3 kpc resolution just 1.6 Gyr after the big bang. The data reveal a clumpy, extended gas reservoir, 14 +/- 4 kpc in diameter, in unprecedented detail. A dynamical analysis shows that the data are consistent with a rotating disk of total dynamical mass 5.4 +/- 2.4 x 10(11) M-circle dot. We use this dynamical mass estimate to constrain the CO-to-H-2 mass conversion factor (alpha(CO)), finding alpha(CO) = 1.1 +/- 0.6 M-circle dot (K km s(-1) pc(2))(-1). We identify five distinct molecular gas clumps in the disk of GN20 with masses a few percent of the total gas mass, brightness temperatures of 16-31K, and surface densities of >3200-4500 x (alpha(CO)/0.8) M-circle dot pc(-2). Virial mass estimates indicate they could be self-gravitating, and we constrain their CO-to-H2 mass conversion factor to be <0.2-0.7 M-circle dot (K km s(-1) pc(2))(-1). A multiwavelength comparison demonstrates that the molecular gas is concentrated in a region of the galaxy that is heavily obscured in the rest-frame UV/optical. We investigate the spatially resolved gas excitation and find that the CO(6-5)/CO(2-1) ratio is constant with radius, consistent with star formation occurring over a large portion of the disk. We discuss the implications of our results in the context of different fueling scenarios for SMGs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available