4.7 Article

WARM GAS IN THE VIRGO CLUSTER. I. DISTRIBUTION OF Lyα ABSORBERS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 754, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/84

Keywords

cosmology: observations; galaxies: clusters: general; intergalactic medium; quasars: absorption lines

Funding

  1. NASA [HST-GO-11698]
  2. Luce Foundation
  3. NSF [AST-0904059]
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0904059, 0908390] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first systematic study of the warm gas (T = 10(4-5) K) distribution across a galaxy cluster is presented using multiple background QSOs in and around the Virgo Cluster. We detect 25 Ly alpha absorbers (N-HI = 10(13.1-15.4)cm(-2)) in the Virgo velocity range toward 9 of 12 QSO sightlines observed with the Cosmic Origin Spectrograph, with a cluster impact parameter range of 0.36-1.65 Mpc (0.23-1.05R(vir)). Including 18 Ly alpha absorbers previously detected by STIS or GHRS toward 7 of 11 background QSOs in and around the Virgo Cluster, we establish a sample of 43 absorbers toward a total of 23 background probes for studying the incidence of Ly alpha absorbers in and around the Virgo Cluster. With these absorbers, we find (1) warm gas is predominantly in the outskirts of the cluster and avoids the X-ray-detected hot intracluster medium (ICM). Also, Ly alpha absorption strength increases with cluster impact parameter. (2) Ly alpha-absorbing warm gas traces cold Hi-emitting gas in the substructures of the Virgo Cluster. (3) Including the absorbers associated with the surrounding substructures, the warm gas covering fraction (100% for N-HI > 10(13.1) cm(-2)) is in agreement with cosmological simulations. We speculate that the observed warm gas is part of large-scale gas flows feeding the cluster both in the ICM and galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available