4.6 Article

Does the mixing length parameter depend on metallicity? Further tests of evolutionary sequences using homogeneous databases

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 392, Issue 1, Pages 115-129

Publisher

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020840

Keywords

stars : evolution; stars : Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) and C-M diagrams; stars : horizontal-branch; stars : Population II; Galaxy : globular clusters : general; Galaxy : halo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper is a further step in the investigation of the morphology of the color-magnitude diagram of Galactic globular clusters, and the fine-tuning of theoretical models, made possible by the recent observational efforts to build homogeneous photometric databases. In particular, we examine here the calibration of the morphological parameter W-HB vs. metallicity, originally proposed by Brocato et al. (1998; B98), which essentially measures the color position of the red-giant branch. We show that the parameter can be used to have a first-order estimate of the cluster metallicity, since the dispersion around the mean trend with [Fe/H] is compatible with the measurement errors. The tight W-HB-[Fe/H] relation is then used to show that variations in helium content or age do not affect the parameter, whereas it is strongly influenced by the mixing-length parameter alpha (as expected). This fact allows us, for the first time, to state that there is no trend of alpha with the metal content of a cluster. A thorough examination of the interrelated questions of the alpha-elements enhancement and the color-T-eff transformations, highlights that there is an urgent need for an independent assessment of which of the two presently accepted metallicity scales is the true indicator of a cluster's iron content. Whatever scenario is adopted, it also appears that a deep revision of the V-I-temperature relations is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available