4.7 Article

THE ARAUCARIA PROJECT: AN ACCURATE DISTANCE TO THE LATE-TYPE DOUBLE-LINED ECLIPSING BINARY OGLE SMC113.3 4007 IN THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 750, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/144

Keywords

binaries: eclipsing; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: individual (SMC); stars: late-type

Funding

  1. Chilean Center for Astrophysics FONDAP [15010003]
  2. BASAL Centro de Astrofisica y Tecnologias Afines (CATA) [PFB-06/2007]
  3. Polish grant [N203 387337]
  4. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  5. FOCUS of the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  6. TEAM of the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP)
  7. European Research Council under the European Community [246678]
  8. National Science Foundation [AST-1008798]
  9. Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have analyzed the long-period, double-lined eclipsing binary system OGLE SMC113.3 4007 (SC10 137844) in the Small Magellanic Cloud. The binary lies in the northeastern part of the galaxy and consists of two evolved, well-detached, non-active G8 giants. The orbit is eccentric with e = 0.311, and the orbital period is 371.6 days. Using extensive high-resolution spectroscopic and multi-color photometric data, we have determined a true distance modulus of the system of m - M = 18.83 +/- 0.02 (statistical) +/- 0.05 (systematic) mag using a surface-brightness-color relation for giant stars. This method is insensitive to metallicity and reddening corrections and depends only very little on stellar atmosphere model assumptions. Additionally, we derived very accurate, at the level of 1%-2%, physical parameters of both giant stars, particularly their masses and radii, making our results important for comparison with stellar evolution models. Our analysis underlines the high potential of late-type, double-lined detached binary systems for accurate distance determinations to nearby galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available