4.6 Article

Methyl iodide: Atmospheric budget and use as a tracer of marine convection in global models

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 107, Issue D17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2001JD001151

Keywords

methyl iodide; marine convection; atmospheric tracer; global budget of methyl iodide

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We simulate the oceanic and atmospheric distribution of methyl iodide (CH3I) with a global 3-D model driven by assimilated meteorological observations from the Goddard Earth Observing System of the NASA Data Assimilation Office and coupled to an oceanic mixed layer model. A global compilation of atmospheric and oceanic observations is used to constrain and evaluate the simulation. Seawater CH3I( aq) in the model is produced photochemically from dissolved organic carbon, and is removed by reaction with Cl- and emission to the atmosphere. The net oceanic emission to the atmosphere is 214 Gg yr(-1). Small terrestrial emissions from rice paddies, wetlands, and biomass burning are also included in the model. The model captures 40% of the variance in the observed seawater CH3I( aq) concentrations. Simulated concentrations at midlatitudes in summer are too high, perhaps because of a missing biological sink of CH3I( aq). We define a marine convection index (MCI) as the ratio of upper tropospheric (8-12 km) to lower tropospheric (0-2.5 km) CH3I concentrations averaged over coherent oceanic regions. The MCI in the observations ranges from 0.11 over strongly subsiding regions (southeastern subtropical Pacific) to 0.40 over strongly upwelling regions (western equatorial Pacific). The model reproduces the observed MCI with no significant global bias (offset of only +11%) but accounts for only 15% of its spatial and seasonal variance. The MCI can be used to test marine convection in global models, complementing the use of radon-222 as a test of continental convection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available