4.7 Article

PLANET HUNTERS: ASSESSING THE KEPLER INVENTORY OF SHORT-PERIOD PLANETS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 754, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/129

Keywords

planets and satellites: detection; planets and satellites: general

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-1003258]
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. Yale University
  4. NASA [10-OUTRCH.210-0001, PF9-00069, NAS8-03060, NAS5-26555]
  5. National Science Foundation CDI [DRL-0941610]
  6. NASA Science Mission directorate
  7. NASA Office of Space Science [NNX09AF08G]
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration under the Exoplanet Exploration Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results from a search of data from the first 33.5 days of the Kepler science mission (Quarter 1) for exoplanet transits by the Planet Hunters citizen science project. Planet Hunters enlists members of the general public to visually identify transits in the publicly released Kepler light curves via the World Wide Web. Over 24,000 volunteers reviewed the Kepler Quarter 1 data set. We examine the abundance of >= 2 R-circle plus planets on short-period (<15 days) orbits based on Planet Hunters detections. We present these results along with an analysis of the detection efficiency of human classifiers to identify planetary transits including a comparison to the Kepler inventory of planet candidates. Although performance drops rapidly for smaller radii, >= 4 R-circle plus Planet Hunters >= 85% efficient at identifying transit signals for planets with periods less than 15 days for the Kepler sample of target stars. Our high efficiency rate for simulated transits along with recovery of the majority of Kepler >= 4 R-circle plus planets suggests that the Kepler inventory of >= 4 R-circle plus short-period planets is nearly complete.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available