4.7 Article

SUPERNOVA SIMULATIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 753, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/152

Keywords

cosmological parameters; dark energy; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation
  3. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  5. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  6. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  7. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  8. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  9. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  10. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  11. Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia
  12. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  13. Collaborating Institutions in the Dark Energy Survey
  14. Argonne National Laboratory
  15. University of California at Santa Cruz
  16. University of Cambridge
  17. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas
  18. Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  19. University of Chicago
  20. University College London
  21. DES-Brazil
  22. Fermilab
  23. University of Edinburgh
  24. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  25. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  26. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  27. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  28. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat
  29. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  30. University of Michigan
  31. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  32. University of Nottingham
  33. Ohio State University
  34. University of Pennsylvania
  35. University of Portsmouth
  36. SLAC
  37. Stanford University
  38. University of Sussex
  39. Texas AM University
  40. [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  41. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  42. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1138737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  43. STFC [ST/I001204/1, ST/G002630/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  44. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001204/1, ST/G002630/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an analysis of supernova light curves simulated for the upcoming Dark Energy Survey (DES) supernova search. The simulations employ a code suite that generates and fits realistic light curves in order to obtain distance modulus/redshift pairs that are passed to a cosmology fitter. We investigated several different survey strategies including field selection, supernova selection biases, and photometric redshift measurements. Using the results of this study, we chose a 30 deg(2) search area in the griz filter set. We forecast (1) that this survey will provide a homogeneous sample of up to 4000 Type Ia supernovae in the redshift range 0.05 < z < 1.2 and (2) that the increased red efficiency of the DES camera will significantly improve high-redshift color measurements. The redshift of each supernova with an identified host galaxy will be obtained from spectroscopic observations of the host. A supernova spectrum will be obtained for a subset of the sample, which will be utilized for control studies. In addition, we have investigated the use of combined photometric redshifts taking into account data from both the host and supernova. We have investigated and estimated the likely contamination from core-collapse supernovae based on photometric identification, and have found that a Type Ia supernova sample purity of up to 98% is obtainable given specific assumptions. Furthermore, we present systematic uncertainties due to sample purity, photometric calibration, dust extinction priors, filter-centroid shifts, and inter-calibration. We conclude by estimating the uncertainty on the cosmological parameters that will be measured from the DES supernova data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available