4.7 Article

REVEALING THE MILLIMETER ENVIRONMENT OF THE NEW FU ORIONIS CANDIDATE HBC722 WITH THE SUBMILLIMETER ARRAY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 755, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/157

Keywords

ISM: individual objects (HBC722); ISM: jets and outflows; stars: flare; stars: formation; stars: low-mass; stars: protostars; stars: variables: T Tauri, Herbig Ae/Be

Funding

  1. Smithsonian Institution
  2. Academia Sinica
  3. NSF [AST-0845619]
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0845619] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present 230 GHz Submillimeter Array continuum and molecular line observations of the newly discovered FU Orionis candidate HBC722. We report the detection of seven 1.3 mm continuum sources in the vicinity of HBC722, none of which corresponds to HBC722 itself. We compile infrared and submillimeter continuum photometry of each source from previous studies and conclude that three are Class 0 embedded protostars, one is a Class I embedded protostar, one is a Class I/II transition object, and two are either starless cores or very young, very low luminosity protostars or first hydrostatic cores. We detect a northwest-southeast outflow, consistent with the previous detection of such an outflow in low-resolution, single-dish observations, and note that its axis may be precessing. We show that this outflow is centered on and driven by one of the nearby Class 0 sources rather than HBC722, and find no conclusive evidence that HBC722 itself is driving an outflow. The non-detection of HBC722 in the 1.3 mm continuum observations suggests an upper limit of 0.02 M-circle dot for the mass of the circumstellar disk. This limit is consistent with typical T Tauri disks and with a disk that provides sufficient mass to power the burst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available