4.7 Article

THE DUST BUDGET OF THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD: ARE ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH STARS THE PRIMARY DUST SOURCE AT LOW METALLICITY?

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 748, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/40

Keywords

dust, extinction; Magellanic Clouds; stars: AGB and post-AGB; supernovae: general

Funding

  1. NASA via JPL [130827, 1340964]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G002355/1, ST/J000035/1, PP/D000955/1, ST/J001384/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [ST/J000035/1, ST/G002355/1, ST/J001384/1, PP/D000955/1, PP/F000057/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We estimate the total dust input from the cool evolved stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, using the 8 mu m excess emission as a proxy for the dust-production rate (DPR). We find that asymptotic giant branch (AGB) and red supergiant (RSG) stars produce (8.6-9.5) x 10(-7) M-circle dot yr(-1) of dust, depending on the fraction of far-infrared sources that belong to the evolved star population (with 10%-50% uncertainty in individual DPRs). RSGs contribute the least (<4%), while carbon-rich AGB stars (especially the so-called extreme AGB stars) account for 87%-89% of the total dust input from cool evolved stars. We also estimate the dust input from hot stars and supernovae (SNe), and find that if SNe produce 10(-3) M-circle dot of dust each, then the total SN dust input and AGB input are roughly equivalent. We consider several scenarios of SN dust production and destruction and find that the interstellar medium (ISM) dust can be accounted for solely by stellar sources if all SNe produce dust in the quantities seen around the dustiest examples and if most SNe explode in dense regions where much of the ISM dust is shielded from the shocks. We find that AGB stars contribute only 2.1% of the ISM dust. Without a net positive contribution from SNe to the dust budget, this suggests that dust must grow in the ISM or be formed by another unknown mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available