4.7 Article

DETECTION OF THE γ-RAY BINARY LS I+61°303 IN A LOW-FLUX STATE AT VERY HIGH ENERGY γ-RAYS WITH THE MAGIC TELESCOPES IN 2009

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 746, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/80

Keywords

binaries: general; gamma rays: general; stars: individual (LS I+61 degrees 303); X-rays: binaries; X-rays: individual (LS I+61 degrees 303)

Funding

  1. German BMBF
  2. MPG
  3. Italian INFN
  4. Swiss National Fund SNF
  5. Spanish MICINN
  6. Marie Curie
  7. CPAN [CSD2007-00042]
  8. MultiDark [CSD2009-00064]
  9. Bulgarian NSF [DO02-353]
  10. Academy of Finland [127740]
  11. YIP of the Helmholtz Gemeinschaft
  12. DFG Cluster of Excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe,
  13. Polish MNiSzW [N203 390834]
  14. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  15. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22840030] Funding Source: KAKEN
  16. Academy of Finland (AKA) [127740, 127740] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present very high energy (E > 100 GeV) gamma-ray observations of the gamma-ray binary system LS I +61 degrees 303 obtained with the MAGIC stereo system between 2009 October and 2010 January. We detect a 6.3 sigma gamma-ray signal above 400 GeV in the combined data set. The integral flux above an energy of 300 GeV is F(E > 300 GeV) = (1.4 +/- 0.3(stat) +/- 0.4(syst)) x 10(-12) cm(-2) s(-1), which corresponds to about 1.3% of the Crab Nebula flux in the same energy range. The orbit-averaged flux of LS I +61 degrees 303 in the orbital phase interval 0.6-0.7, where a maximum of the TeV flux is expected, is lower by almost an order of magnitude compared to our previous measurements between 2005 September and 2008 January. This provides evidence for a new low-flux state in LS I +61 degrees 303. We find that the change to the low-flux state cannot be solely explained by an increase of photon-photon absorption around the compact star.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available