4.8 Article

HMGB1 B box increases the permeability of Caco-2 enterocytic monolayers and impairs intestinal barrier function in mice

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 790-802

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.35391

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM58484, GM37631, GM62508] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: High mobility group (HMG) B1 is a nonhistone nuclear protein that was recently identified as a late-acting mediator of lipopolysaccharide-induced lethality in mice. The proinflammatory actions of HMGB1 have been localized to a region of the molecule called the B box. Methods: To determine whether HMGB:l or B box are capable of causing derangements in intestinal barrier function, we incubated cultured Caco-2 human enterocytic monolayers with recombinant human HMGB1 or a 74-residue truncated form of the protein consisting of the B box domain. Results: Both HMGB1 and B box increased the permeability of Caco-2 monolayers to fluorescein Isothiocyanate-labeled dextran (17134) in a time- and dose-dependent fashion. The increase in permeability was reversible following removal of the recombinant protein. Exposure of Caco-2 cells to B box resulted in increased expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase messenger RNA and increased production of NO. When we used various pharmacologic strategies to inhibit NO production or scavenge NO or peroxynitrite (ONOO-), we abrogated B box-induced hyperpermeability. Administration of B box to wild-type mice increased both ileal mucosal permeability to FD4 and bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes. These effects were not observed in inducible nitric oxide synthase knockout mice. Conclusions: These data support the view that HMGB1 and B box are capable of causing alterations in gut barrier function via a mechanism that depends on the formation of NO and ONOO-.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available