4.7 Article

OPTICAL AND INFRARED ANALYSIS OF TYPE II SN 2006bc

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 753, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/109

Keywords

circumstellar matter; dust, extinction; supernovae: individual (SN 2006bc)

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-0707691, AST-0503871, AST-0803158]
  2. HST [HST-GO-11229.03-A]
  3. STFC [ST/J001511/1, ST/G002827/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001511/1, ST/G002827/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present nebular phase optical imaging and spectroscopy and near/mid-IR imaging of the Type II SN 2006bc. Observations reveal the central wavelength of the symmetric H alpha line profile to be redshifted with respect to the host galaxy H alpha emission by day 325. Such a phenomenon has been argued to result from an asymmetric explosion in the iron-peak elements resulting in a larger mass of Ni-56 and higher excitation of hydrogen on the far side of the supernova (SN) explosion. We also observe a gradual blueshifting of this H alpha peak which is indicative of dust formation in the ejecta. Although showing a normal peak brightness, V similar to -17.2, for a core-collapse SN, 2006bc fades by similar to 6 mag during the first 400 days suggesting either a relatively low Ni-56 yield, an increase in extinction due to new dust, or both. A short-duration flattening of the light curve is observed from day 416 to day 541 suggesting an optical light echo. Based on the narrow time window of this echo, we discuss implications on the location and geometry of the reflecting interstellar medium. With our radiative transfer models, we find an upper limit of 2 x 10(-3) M-circle dot of dust around SN 2006bc. In the event that all of this dust were formed during the SN explosion, this quantity of dust is still several orders of magnitude lower than that needed to explain the large quantities of dust observed in the early universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available