4.7 Review

Reference measurement systems in clinical chemistry

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 323, Issue 1-2, Pages 73-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00188-2

Keywords

traceability; Systeme International d'Unites; standardization; international unit system; reference measurement procedure; reference materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In clinical chemistry, traceability of measurements is of high priority. Methods: In this literature review, current recommendations on the process of establishing traceability (or standardization) are critically discussed. Results: Traceability is to be established to the highest international standards by a comprehensive reference measurement system. Elementary to this system are a metrological basis, a measurement unit system, i.e., the Systeme International d'Unites (SI), its embodiment by a material standard and a calibration hierarchy for transfer of accuracy/trueness to the manufacturer's product calibrators and routine methods. However, for analytes lacking an unequivocally recognized entity, the International Unit (FU) and International Standard (IS) concept have been developed. On this basis, the review distinguishes between traceability of SI- and IU-analytes. Conclusions: SI-traceability, exemplified by cortisol, is straightforward. However, special attention is needed for free analytes and analyte families. For traceability of IU-analytes, exemplified by hCG, the standardization process passes different phases in function of the history of the analyte (discovery, ISs, measurement by bioassays/immunoassays, complete structure elucidation). However, perspectives to the development of an SI-based reference measurement system are realistic. Last but not least, for successful global implementation of the standardization process, consensus of all major players in the field will be required. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available