4.7 Article

THE INTERACTION OF COSMIC RAYS WITH DIFFUSE CLOUDS

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 739, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/60

Keywords

cosmic rays; ISM: clouds; ISM: jets and outflows; ISM: magnetic fields

Funding

  1. NSF [PHY 0821899, AST 0907837, AST 0507367, PHY 0215581]
  2. NASA [NNX10AO50G]
  3. NASA [NNX10AO50G, 127381] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0907837] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the change in cosmic-ray pressure, the change in cosmic-ray density, and the level of cosmic-ray-induced heating via Alfven-wave damping when cosmic rays move from a hot ionized plasma to a cool cloud embedded in that plasma. The general analysis method outlined here can apply to diffuse clouds in either the ionized interstellar medium or in galactic winds. We introduce a general-purpose model of cosmic-ray diffusion building upon the hydrodynamic approximation for cosmic rays (from McKenzie & Volk and Breitschwerdt and collaborators). Our improved method self-consistently derives the cosmic-ray flux and diffusivity under the assumption that the streaming instability is the dominant mechanism for setting the cosmic-ray flux and diffusion. We find that, as expected, cosmic rays do not couple to gas within cool clouds (cosmic rays exert no forces inside of cool clouds), that the cosmic-ray density does not increase within clouds (it may decrease slightly in general, and decrease by an order of magnitude in some cases), and that cosmic-ray heating (via Alfven-wave damping and not collisional effects as for similar to 10 MeV cosmic rays) is only important under the conditions of relatively strong (10 mu G) magnetic fields or high cosmic-ray pressure (similar to 10(-11) erg cm(-3)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available