4.5 Article

Infrequent occurrence of age-dependent changes in CpG island methylation as detected by restriction landmark genome scanning

Journal

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 123, Issue 11, Pages 1487-1503

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-6374(02)00080-5

Keywords

DNA methylation; aging; T cells

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI42753] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR42525] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [AG014783] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypermethylation of CpG islands, resulting in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, is an early event in the development of some malignancies. Recent studies suggest that this abnormal methylation may be a function of aging. The number of CpG islands that methylate with age is unknown. We used restriction landmark genome scanning (RLGS) to approximate the extent to which CpG islands change methylation status during aging. Comparison of more than 2000 loci in T lymphocytes isolated from newborn, middle age, and elderly people revealed that 29 loci ( similar to 1%) changed methylation status during aging, with 23 increasing methylation, and six decreasing. The same subset also changed methylation status with age in the esophagus, lung, and pancreas, but in variable directions. Virtual genome scanning identified one of these loci as a member of the forkhead family, recently implicated in aging, and another as an EST fragment. The methylation status of both correlated with level of expression. Confirming studies in multiple tissues from normal and DNMTl+/- mice demonstrated only one age dependent change in the methylation of more than 2000 loci, occurring in liver and kidney. These results indicate that the methylation status of the majority of CpG islands in both mice and humans is tightly controlled during aging, and that changes are infrequent and in humans confined to a specific subset of genes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available