4.2 Article

Aphid parasitoids detect that an alien plant was present nearby during their development

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 199-205

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00285.x

Keywords

Aerial allelopathy; aphid parasitoids; Aphidius rhopalosiphi; host plant odours; Metopolophium dirhodum; marigolds; tomato volatiles; wheat

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glasshouse and laboratory experiments were conducted with Aphidius rhopalosiphi parasitizing Metopolophium dirhodum to test whether the presence in the same environment of another plant species (tomato or marigold) induced aerial allelopathy in wheat plants. Emerging parasitoids were offered the choice of two odours of wheat plants in an olfactometer - wheat grown alone and wheat grown in the presence of the second plant species. Female parasitoids responded more strongly than males, but both sexes preferred the odour of wheat grown in the environment in which they had developed (i.e. with or without the second plant species present). Moving the tomato plants from the cages where they had been placed with wheat to the cages that had previously had wheat alone just before the aphid mummy formed showed that the odour environment the emerging parasitoid responded to was that of the mummy rather than that of the developing parasitoid larva. From this it was concluded that the parasitoids in the olfactometer were responding not only to wheat volatiles, but also to tomato volatiles absorbed on the surface of the mummy and encountered by the emerging adult parasitoid. By excising the parasitoid pupa from the mummy formed on one wheat cultivar, and offering the emerging parasitoids the surface of aphid mummies formed on a different cultivar, it was confirmed that olfactometer responses represented a learning of the chemistry of the surface of the mummy encountered at or after emergence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available