Journal
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 310-316Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200209000-00006
Keywords
pediatric pain assessment; psychometrics; VAS; visual analog scale
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Design: The authors reviewed the available pediatric pain literature and selected those studies that reported quantitative information on the reliability and validity of, and the optimal cutoff points for, the visual analog scale (VAS) when used as an observational pediatric pain tool. Results: Available psychometric findings concerning the observational VAS (VAS(obs)) are limited. The estimated interrater reliability of the VAS(obs) from 9 studies ranged from 0.36 to 0.91. The correlation between self-report and the VAS(obs) was variable and ranged 0.23 to 0.83 in 6 studies. The concurrent validity of the VAS(obs) and other pain instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.86. Conclusions: Further psychometric testing needs to be conducted on intraobserver reliability, responsiveness, and optimal cutoff points. Future research may guide the choice between VAS(obs) and the numerous behavioral pain instruments.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available