4.7 Article

THE EXOPLANET CENSUS: A GENERAL METHOD APPLIED TO KEPLER

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 742, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/38

Keywords

methods: statistical; planetary systems; planets and satellites: detection; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; planets and satellites: formation

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX10AF35G]
  2. Smithsonian Institute
  3. NASA [NNX10AF35G, 134849] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We develop a general method to fit the underlying planetary distribution function (PLDF) to exoplanet survey data. This maximum likelihood method accommodates more than one planet per star and any number of planet or target star properties. We apply the method to announced Kepler planet candidates that transit solar-type stars. The Kepler team's estimates of the detection efficiency are used and are shown to agree with theoretical predictions for an ideal transit survey. The PLDF is fit to a joint power law in planet radius, down to 0.5 R(circle plus), and orbital period, up to 50 days. The estimated number of planets per star in this sample is similar to 0.7-1.4, where the range covers systematic uncertainties in the detection efficiency. To analyze trends in the PLDF we consider four planet samples, divided between shorter and longer periods at 7 days and between large and small radii at 3 R(circle plus). The size distribution changes appreciably between these four samples, revealing a relative deficit of similar to 3 R(circle plus). planets at the shortest periods. This deficit is suggestive of preferential evaporation and sublimation of Neptune-and Saturn-like planets. If the trend and explanation hold, it would be spectacular observational support of the core accretion and migration hypotheses, and would allow refinement of these theories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available