4.7 Article

THE FIRST DETECTION OF BLUE STRAGGLER STARS IN THE MILKY WAY BULGE

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 735, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/37

Keywords

binaries: close; blue stragglers; Galaxy: bulge; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; Galaxy: stellar content; Galaxy: structure

Funding

  1. STScI, NASA [GO-9750, GO-10466]
  2. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  3. FONDAP Center for Astrophysics [15010003]
  4. BASAL CATA Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies [PFB-06]
  5. MILENIO Milky Way Millennium Nucleus [P07-021F]
  6. FONDECYT [1110393, 1090213]
  7. [AST-0709479]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the first detections of Blue Straggler Stars (BSS) in the bulge of the Milky Way. Proper motions from extensive space-based observations along a single sight line allow us to separate a sufficiently clean and well-characterized bulge sample such that we are able to detect a small population of bulge objects in the region of the color-magnitude diagram commonly occupied by young objects and blue stragglers. Variability measurements of these objects clearly establish that a fraction of them are blue stragglers. Out of the 42 objects found in this region of the color-magnitude diagram, we estimate that at least 18 are genuine BSS. We normalize the BSS population by our estimate of the number of horizontal branch stars in the bulge in order to compare the bulge to other stellar systems. The BSS fraction is clearly discrepant from that found in stellar clusters. The blue straggler population of dwarf spheroidals remains a subject of debate; some authors claim an anticorrelation between the normalized blue straggler fraction and integrated light. If this trend is real, then the bulge may extend it by three orders of magnitude in mass. Conversely, we find that the genuinely young (<5 Gyr) population in the bulge, must be at most 3.4% under the most conservative scenario for the BSS population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available