4.7 Article

MOLECULAR OUTFLOWS FROM THE PROTOCLUSTER SERPENS SOUTH

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 737, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/56

Keywords

ISM: clouds; ISM: jets and outflows; stars: formation; submillimeter: ISM; turbulence

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [98-2112-M-001-002-MY3]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  3. [20403003]
  4. [20540228]
  5. [22340040]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20540228, 23840044] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of CO (J = 3-2) and HCO+ (J = 4-3) mapping observations toward a nearby embedded cluster, Serpens South, using the ASTE 10 m telescope. Our CO (J = 3-2) map reveals that many outflows are crowded in the dense cluster-forming clump that can be recognized as an HCO+ clump with a size of similar to 0.2 pc and mass of similar to 80 M-circle dot. The clump contains several subfragments with sizes of similar to 0.05 pc. By comparing the CO (J = 3-2) map with the 1.1 mm dust continuum image taken by AzTEC on ASTE, we find that the spatial extents of the outflow lobes are sometimes anti-correlated with the distribution of the dense gas, and some of the outflow lobes apparently collide with the dense gas. The total outflow mass, momentum, and energy are estimated to be 0.6 M-circle dot, 8 M-circle dot km s(-1), and 64 M-circle dot km(2) s(-2), respectively. The energy injection rate due to the outflows is comparable to the turbulence dissipation rate in the clump, implying that the protostellar outflows can maintain the supersonic turbulence in this region. The total outflow energy seems only about 10% of the clump gravitational energy. We conclude that the current outflow activity is not enough to destroy the whole cluster-forming clump, and therefore star formation is likely to continue for several or many local dynamical times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available