4.7 Article

THE LICK-CARNEGIE SURVEY: FOUR NEW EXOPLANET CANDIDATES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 727, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/117

Keywords

methods: numerical; planets and satellites: detection

Funding

  1. NASA Astrobiology Institute at NASA Ames Research Center
  2. NSF [AST-0449986, AST-0307493, AST-0908870]
  3. NASA OSS [NNX07AR40G]
  4. NASA
  5. Carnegie Institution of Washington
  6. NASA Astrobiology Institute at the Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii [NNA04CC08A]
  7. NASA/EXOB [NNX09AN05G]
  8. UC-Keck
  9. UH-Keck
  10. NASA-Keck Time Assignment Committees
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0908870] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new precise HIRES radial velocity (RV) data sets of five nearby stars obtained at Keck Observatory. HD 31253, HD 218566, HD 177830, HD 99492, and HD 74156 are host stars of spectral classes F through K and show RV variations consistent with new or additional planetary companions in Keplerian motion. The orbital parameters of the candidate planets in the five planetary systems span minimum masses of M sin i = 27.43 M-empty set to 8.28 M-J, periods of 17.05-4696.95 days and eccentricities ranging from circular to extremely eccentric (e approximate to 0.63). The fifth star, HD 74156, was known to have both a 52 day and a 2500 day planet, and was claimed to also harbor a third planet at 336 days, in apparent support of the Packed Planetary System hypothesis. Our greatly expanded data set for HD 74156 provides strong confirmation of both the 52 day and 2500 day planets, but strongly contradicts the existence of a 336 day planet, and offers no significant evidence for any other planets in the system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available