4.5 Article

Quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric analysis of 2-and 3-series prostaglandins in cultured tumor cells

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 308, Issue 1, Pages 168-177

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00218-X

Keywords

prostaglandins; Isoprostanes; simultaneous quantitative analysis; LC/MS/MS

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA91844] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a rapid and simple technique for the simultaneous quantitative analysis of PGE(2), PGE(3), and other closely related prostaglandins from cultured cells using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. This method permits quantification of selected individual prostaglandins derived either from arachidonic acid (AA) or eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) from cell extracts without tedious derivatization, lengthy sample preparation, and separation required by GC-MS- or HPLC-UV-based methods. The validation assessment showed that the quantitative determination is linear (r(2) > 0.999) for both PGE(2) and PGE(3) in the range tested (1-500 ng/ml, 0.0028-1.4 muM) and a coefficient of variation lower than 10% was obtained for samples analyzed on 3 separate days. The detection limit was 2.5 pg for both PGE(2) and PGE(3). Extraction efficiency of PGE(2) and PGE(3) from cell suspensions ranged from 89.4 to 98.2%. As an application of the method, prostaglandins formed by EPA in human lung cancer A549 cells were determined. A 62% reduction of PGE(2) formation was noted when A549 cells were treated with 100 muM of EPA. Concomitantly, EPA increased formation of PGE(3) by 10-fold in A549 cells. This is the first report that unequivocally demonstrates that EPA can be converted to PGE(3) by cyclooxygenase in human cancer cells. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available