4.7 Article

A COMPLETE SAMPLE OF ULTRALUMINOUS X-RAY SOURCE HOST GALAXIES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 741, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/49

Keywords

galaxies: general; surveys; X-rays: binaries; X-rays: galaxies; X-rays: general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One hundred seven ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) with 0.3-10.0 keV luminosities in excess of 10(39) erg s(-1) are identified in a complete sample of 127 nearby galaxies. The sample includes all galaxies within 14.5 Mpc above the completeness limits of both the Uppsala Galaxy Catalogue and the Infrared Astronomical Satellite survey. The galaxy sample spans all Hubble types, a four-decade range in mass, 7.5 < log(M/M-circle dot) < 11.4, and in star formation rate, 0.0002 < SFR(M-circle dot yr(-1)) <= 3.6. ULXs are detected in this sample at rates of one per 3.2 x 10(10) M-circle dot, one per similar to 0.5 M-circle dot yr(-1) star formation rate, and one per 57 Mpc(3) corresponding to a luminosity density of similar to 2 x 10(37) erg s(-1) Mpc(-3). At these rates we estimate as many as 19 additional ULXs remain undetected in fainter dwarf galaxies within the survey volume. An estimated 14 objects, or 13%, of the 107 ULX candidates are expected to be background sources. The differential ULX luminosity function shows a power-law slope alpha similar to -0.8 to -2.0 with an exponential cutoff at similar to 20 x 10(39) erg s(-1) with precise values depending on the model and on whether the ULX luminosities are estimated from their observed numbers of counts or, for a subset of candidates, from their spectral shapes. Extrapolating the observed luminosity function predicts at most one very luminous ULX, L-X similar to 10(41) erg s(-1), within a distance as small as 100 Mpc. The luminosity distribution of ULXs within the local universe cannot account for the recent claims of luminosities in excess of 2 x 10(41) erg s(-1), requiring a new population class to explain these extreme objects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available