4.7 Article

A SEARCH FOR YOUNG STARS IN THE S0 GALAXIES OF A SUPER-GROUP AT z=0.37

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 740, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/54

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: photometry; methods: observational

Funding

  1. NASA [NAS 5-26555, NNG05GE82G, NNX11AI47G]
  2. NASA through JPL/Caltech [20683]
  3. JPL/Caltech SST [GO-20683]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP002-110576]
  5. [NASA/HST/G0-10499]
  6. NASA [NNX11AI47G, 144244] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze Galaxy Evolution Explorer UV data for a system of four gravitationally bound groups at z = 0.37, SG1120, which is destined to merge into a Coma-mass cluster by z = 0, to study how galaxy properties may change during cluster assembly. Of the 38 visually classified S0 galaxies, with masses ranging from log(M-*)[M-circle dot] approximate to 10-11, we detect only one in the near-UV (NUV) channel, a strongly star-forming S0 that is the brightest UV source with a measured redshift placing it in SG1120. Stacking the undetected S0 galaxies (which generally lie on or near the optical red sequence of SG1120) still results in no NUV/far-UV (FUV) detection (<2 sigma). Using our limit in the NUV band, we conclude that for a rapidly truncating star formation rate, star formation ceased at least similar to 0.1-0.7 Gyr ago, depending on the strength of the starburst prior to truncation. With an exponentially declining star formation history over a range of timescales, we rule out recent star formation over a wide range of ages. We conclude that if S0 formation involves significant star formation, it occurred well before the groups were in this current pre-assembly phase. As such, it seems that S0 formation is even more likely to be predominantly occurring outside of the cluster environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available